Aidan: Yeah, I was considering giving people a 5-min break after the first two days but decided against it.
Jared: yes, your example fits the contextualist's purposes better. But the problem is that they cannot (easily) account for the felicity of the other example.
On Feb 02 Louis Frederick commented on working your way up I have worked for two months, two months ago I was hesitating whether I should continue my study or...(more)
3 comments:
Man, that's one long talk!
Question: In the "retraction problem," I get a hunch that the following might better represent a contextual exchange (roles of you and me reversed):
You: ...So, you see, I'm not *sure* that my car is in the driveway.
Me: But a few hours ago you said you knew it was there.
You: I *might have been wrong*. I didn't know *for sure*.
In this revised example, you don't mean different things by know (according to contextualism) but you tack on a quantity of "sureness."
Or does this revision only highlight the involvement of a "judge parameter"?
Aidan: Yeah, I was considering giving people a 5-min break after the first two days but decided against it.
Jared: yes, your example fits the contextualist's purposes better. But the problem is that they cannot (easily) account for the felicity of the other example.
Post a Comment